We collaborate to achieve sustainable success
Get in touch with usWhat Supply-Chain Data Reveals About HVACR’s New Reality
Much of the public discussion around the refrigerant transition focuses on regulatory targets, environmental ambition, and the gradual replacement of high-global warming potential (GWP) gases. While these narratives are accurate, they risk obscuring where the most consequential changes are actually taking place.
Recent EU production, trade, and supply data reveals a more precise story: the refrigerant transition is being absorbed primarily at the manufacturing and import stage, not at the point of installation or servicing. Equipment volumes entering the market remain relatively stable, but the refrigerants embedded within them are changing rapidly. This upstream shift is quietly embedding regulatory compliance, supply risk, and cost exposure into HVACR systems long before they reach contractors or end users.
Understanding this structural change is critical. It explains why refrigerant availability is tightening, why servicing costs are rising, and why compliance risk is increasingly difficult to mitigate once equipment is deployed. For manufacturers, distributors, contractors, and asset owners alike, this new reality demands a strategic reassessment of how refrigerant risk is managed across the system lifecycle.
A Market in Transition, Not Contraction
EU supply statistics confirm that total fluorinated gas volumes placed on the market peaked in 2014–2015 and have declined steadily since the introduction of the F-gas phase-down regime. In 2024 alone, overall physical F-gas supply fell by approximately 11% compared with 2023. Over the longer term, EU production of HFCs has dropped by roughly 72% relative to historic baseline levels.
At first glance, such figures might suggest a contracting HVACR market. However, trade data tells a different story.
Imports of HVACR equipment into the EU have remained broadly stable in physical terms. In 2024, total equipment imports were marginally higher by tonnes than in the previous year, even as the associated CO₂-equivalent footprint declined slightly. This confirms that demand for HVACR systems remains robust across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors.
The key shift, therefore, is not how much equipment is entering the market, but what refrigerants that equipment contains.
Manufacturers are systematically redesigning product platforms to comply with tightening regulatory thresholds. High-GWP refrigerants such as R410A, R404A, and R134a are being displaced by lower-impact alternatives including R32, CO₂, propane (R290), ammonia, and emerging A2L blends.
This upstream adaptation allows equipment volumes to remain stable while regulatory compliance improves. However, it also transfers compliance risk, availability constraints, and long-term servicing challenges directly into system architecture.
Manufacturing as the Primary Adjustment Point
The concentration of adjustment at the manufacturing stage is not accidental. Regulatory compliance is most efficiently achieved during product design, where refrigerant choice, component materials, and system configuration can be optimised holistically.
From a manufacturer’s perspective, shifting refrigerant platforms upstream offers several advantages:
• It minimises quota exposure associated with high-GWP refrigerants.
• It reduces long-term regulatory uncertainty.
• It preserves market access beyond future phase-down milestones.
However, this design-led adaptation creates downstream consequences that are only now becoming visible.
Once equipment enters the market, refrigerant choice becomes largely fixed for the operational life of the system. Contractors and asset owners inherit the implications of upstream decisions, including:
• Long-term refrigerant availability
• Safety considerations associated with flammable or high-pressure gases
• Compliance requirements for handling and servicing
• Total cost of ownership over multi-decade lifecycles
This explains why refrigerant strategy is rapidly evolving from a technical consideration into a core element of asset risk management.
The Installed Base: A Structural Bottleneck
Despite accelerating adoption of low-GWP refrigerants in new systems, the global installed base remains dominated by legacy equipment.
Commercial chillers, VRF installations, rooftop units, and industrial refrigeration systems typically operate for 15 to 30 years. Consequently, millions of systems deployed across Europe continue to rely on high-GWP refrigerants for servicing, even as regulatory pressure restricts their legal supply.
This creates a structural bottleneck:
• Regulators are compressing supply to meet climate objectives.
• Installed systems require ongoing access to legacy refrigerants.
The result is escalating scarcity, price volatility, and compliance complexity in the service refrigerant market. Contractors face rising procurement challenges, while asset owners confront increasing uncertainty around maintenance continuity.
As quotas tighten further toward the 2027 inflection point, these pressures are expected to intensify, particularly during seasonal peaks when service demand surges.
Import Patterns Reveal Embedded Compliance Risk
The relative stability of HVACR equipment imports masks a fundamental shift in regulatory exposure.
Because refrigerant selection now occurs primarily upstream, importers and distributors are assuming greater responsibility for compliance outcomes. Pre-charged equipment carries embedded refrigerant quotas, documentation obligations, and regulatory liabilities that cannot be easily altered once products cross borders.
This has several implications:
• Importers face increased scrutiny from regulators, particularly regarding quota documentation and traceability.
• Equipment sourcing strategies must now align closely with refrigerant compliance planning.
• Non-compliant imports risk seizure, penalties, and reputational damage.
As enforcement intensity rises, regulatory due diligence is becoming a critical commercial capability rather than an administrative afterthought.
Cost Dynamics and Market Volatility
The compression of legal refrigerant supply is reshaping market economics.
As quotas tighten and production volumes decline, prices for high-GWP refrigerants have risen sharply across multiple markets. Volatility has increased, driven by:
• Seasonal demand fluctuations
• Import constraints
• Administrative bottlenecks
• Geopolitical disruptions affecting chemical supply chains
For contractors, this translates into unpredictable procurement costs and margin pressure. For asset owners, it manifests as rising maintenance expenditure and greater difficulty budgeting long-term service contracts.
Moreover, price volatility creates fertile ground for illicit trade, increasing the risk of counterfeit refrigerants entering legitimate supply chains. As regulatory and commercial pressures intensify, supply-chain governance becomes not only a cost-control mechanism but a critical safety function.
Operational Implications for Key Stakeholders
Manufacturers and OEMs
OEMs now face compressed design timelines, narrowing refrigerant options, and heightened compliance risk. Platform decisions made today will shape market access, production economics, and serviceability for decades.
Failing to anticipate regulatory trajectories risks stranded product investments and accelerated obsolescence.
Contractors and Service Providers
Service companies must navigate increasing refrigerant scarcity, evolving safety standards, and rising compliance obligations. Inventory planning, technician training, and procurement strategy are becoming increasingly complex and capital-intensive.
Asset Owners and Investors
For asset owners, refrigerant exposure is emerging as a strategic risk factor alongside energy performance and carbon emissions. Equipment choice increasingly affects:
• Long-term operating expenditure
• Compliance exposure
• Residual asset value
• Investment-grade risk assessments
In institutional portfolios, refrigerant compliance is becoming a due-diligence metric capable of influencing acquisition and divestment decisions.
Why Reactive Management Is No Longer Viable
Historically, refrigerant procurement and compliance were managed reactively, responding to market availability and regulatory enforcement as they arose. This approach is rapidly becoming untenable.
The convergence of regulatory tightening, manufacturing adaptation, and installed base inertia ensures that supply constraints and compliance risks will persist for the foreseeable future. Businesses that rely on short-term sourcing strategies are increasingly exposed to:
• Procurement disruptions
• Price shocks
• Regulatory penalties
• Safety incidents
Proactive planning, by contrast, allows organisations to sequence equipment upgrades, stabilise refrigerant sourcing, and mitigate compliance exposure well in advance of regulatory thresholds.
